Market regulator SEBI today extended the deadline for mutual funds to implement the ASBA facility for new fund offers to October 1.
Under ASBA--Application Supported by Blocked Amount-- deposits of applicants remain in their accounts till the shares are allotted.
"It has been decided that Mutual Funds/AMCs shall provide ASBA facility to investors for all NFOs launched on or after October 1, 2010," the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) said in a circular.
Earlier in March Sebi had made it compulsory for MFs to extend ASBA facility for all NFOs from July 1.
ASBA is currently in place for all participants in the Indian capital market.
The move would help investors save interest cost on borrowing and help companies get rid of the hassles associated with refunds.
However, some experts feel that the said move will not have much implication for the market, since mutual funds get most subscription in last days of its closing.
Sebi said the move would "protect the interest of investors in securities and promote the development and better regulation of the securities market."
In March the market regulator had also reduced the period between the opening and closing of issues from the present 30-45 days to 15 days to ensure that investors' money is not blocked for longer period.
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Learn why FDs are hazardous for wealth creation
Can you find anyone who has become wealthy by leaving his or her money in the bank or an FD? If you want to create wealth, you must move away from this mentality of thinking that a savings account or an FD is the best home for your money.Much has been made of the so-called comparison between mutual funds and ULIPs in the past few months. Our opinion is that the public debate on these two investment options misses the bigger point. The reality is that the bulk of the household savings for Indian families is tied up in bank accounts earning 3.5% interest and in FDs, both of which are highly inefficient investment options for wealth creation. Add to this the announcement this week that inflation has now touched double digit levels, and its an even scarier thought that most of us still prefer to leave our money in a bank, rather than in instruments that are higher yielding, be they equity mutual funds or ULIPs.
So the real debate should be whether families in their effort to create wealth are making a mistake in leaving their money in the bank vs. choosing to invest through instruments like mutual funds and ULIPs that offer a reasonable prospect of better long-term returns.
Mutual Funds vs. ULIPs - no big deal
Call it a turf war or clash of regulators, frankly in the long run it's not a big deal from the end customer's perspective. Whether its SEBI or IRDA, consumers should feel comfortable and secure that there is a regulator who is mandated to look after their interests.
Every investment instrument has pros and cons. We challenge you to find one that is perfect. So, there will always be promoters or detractors of both mutual funds and ULIPs.
Objectively speaking, however, there is a better chance of you being able to meet your long-term financial goals through equity mutual funds and/or a ULIP than the default option for most Indians, which is to leave money in the bank.
Almost every one of us will have one of the following goals that require a substantial amount of money in the future: funding our graduate education, marriage, house purchase, taking care of children's financial needs, funding their education and marriage, being adequately funded towards our own retirement.
Experience from all over the world has shown that our salaries are not enough to fund these goals. We need to invest into the capital markets, subject to our risk taking capacity, to take advantage of the compounding of capital, i.e., money that creates more money. No lesser authority than Albert Einstein remarked, "compounding is the 8th wonder of the world because it allows for the systematic accumulation of wealth".
The advantage of equity mutual funds and ULIPs is that they are instruments that offer you a better rate of compounding for your capital than cash lying in the bank, and thereby provide a better chance of creating wealth in the long run.
Savings Accounts and FDs - bad deal for wealth creation
Let's make ourselves clear. Savings accounts and FDs have a purpose and we cannot over generalize and make a blanket statement that they are bad instruments. However, when it comes to wealth creation they are not good instruments for you to invest through. We will show you why.
First of all, a savings account earns you a mere 3.5% interest rate, a level that is fixed arbitrarily. Similarly, a fixed deposit contractually fixes the rate of return at the start date of your deposit, and you cannot earn more than what you signed up for, even if interest rates in the markets were to rise. Compare this to a return that the equity market can earn you. History and experience of equity markets from around the world suggests that in the long-term equity markets are likely to "compound your capital" at approximately 12% per annum. Compared to this, a 3.5% savings account return just does not match up.
Secondly, savings accounts and FDs are highly tax inefficient. Any interest you earn through these will be taxable in your hands as income, and you will be liable to pay tax on this income. Compare this to equity mutual funds and ULIPs where at least for the time being until the new direct tax code is implemented you pay zero taxes on your gains if you hold these instruments for the long-term. And, if you invest into an equity linked savings scheme (ELSS mutual fund) you might find this an even more tax efficient investment than a regular mutual fund.
Finally, and perhaps most crucially, by leaving your money in a bank or an FD, you are losing the purchasing power of that money. Because you are earning a fixed return through these instruments, these instruments cannot offset the corrosive effect of inflation or rising prices within the economy. If one's bank account returns only 3.5% pre-tax, but the level of prices is rising at 10%, one doesn't have to be a mathematical genius to figure out that in the long run one's standard of living will suffer. You will hardly be able to create any wealth, because whatever returns you earn does not even help you keep pace with the rising prices in the economy, let alone give you a surplus that can earn you further returns.
If you are already wealthy then FDs might be a good wealth preservation instrument, but please don't use them to create wealth for yourself.
Don't sit idle, invest actively
Putting your money into a savings account of an FD is almost akin to sitting idle. India is going through an inflection, which is likely to last for a few decades, where the equity capital markets will be the best avenue for long-term investment and a good way to build an alternate and legitimate source of wealth. If you believe in India's economic growth potential, then move at least some of your money from your bank account into a higher yielding instrument to give yourself a fair chance to create long-term wealth.
By www.iTrust.in - India's leading one-stop financial supermarket for real estate, home loans, investments, taxes and financial planning.
So the real debate should be whether families in their effort to create wealth are making a mistake in leaving their money in the bank vs. choosing to invest through instruments like mutual funds and ULIPs that offer a reasonable prospect of better long-term returns.
Mutual Funds vs. ULIPs - no big deal
Call it a turf war or clash of regulators, frankly in the long run it's not a big deal from the end customer's perspective. Whether its SEBI or IRDA, consumers should feel comfortable and secure that there is a regulator who is mandated to look after their interests.
Every investment instrument has pros and cons. We challenge you to find one that is perfect. So, there will always be promoters or detractors of both mutual funds and ULIPs.
Objectively speaking, however, there is a better chance of you being able to meet your long-term financial goals through equity mutual funds and/or a ULIP than the default option for most Indians, which is to leave money in the bank.
Almost every one of us will have one of the following goals that require a substantial amount of money in the future: funding our graduate education, marriage, house purchase, taking care of children's financial needs, funding their education and marriage, being adequately funded towards our own retirement.
Experience from all over the world has shown that our salaries are not enough to fund these goals. We need to invest into the capital markets, subject to our risk taking capacity, to take advantage of the compounding of capital, i.e., money that creates more money. No lesser authority than Albert Einstein remarked, "compounding is the 8th wonder of the world because it allows for the systematic accumulation of wealth".
The advantage of equity mutual funds and ULIPs is that they are instruments that offer you a better rate of compounding for your capital than cash lying in the bank, and thereby provide a better chance of creating wealth in the long run.
Savings Accounts and FDs - bad deal for wealth creation
Let's make ourselves clear. Savings accounts and FDs have a purpose and we cannot over generalize and make a blanket statement that they are bad instruments. However, when it comes to wealth creation they are not good instruments for you to invest through. We will show you why.
First of all, a savings account earns you a mere 3.5% interest rate, a level that is fixed arbitrarily. Similarly, a fixed deposit contractually fixes the rate of return at the start date of your deposit, and you cannot earn more than what you signed up for, even if interest rates in the markets were to rise. Compare this to a return that the equity market can earn you. History and experience of equity markets from around the world suggests that in the long-term equity markets are likely to "compound your capital" at approximately 12% per annum. Compared to this, a 3.5% savings account return just does not match up.
Secondly, savings accounts and FDs are highly tax inefficient. Any interest you earn through these will be taxable in your hands as income, and you will be liable to pay tax on this income. Compare this to equity mutual funds and ULIPs where at least for the time being until the new direct tax code is implemented you pay zero taxes on your gains if you hold these instruments for the long-term. And, if you invest into an equity linked savings scheme (ELSS mutual fund) you might find this an even more tax efficient investment than a regular mutual fund.
Finally, and perhaps most crucially, by leaving your money in a bank or an FD, you are losing the purchasing power of that money. Because you are earning a fixed return through these instruments, these instruments cannot offset the corrosive effect of inflation or rising prices within the economy. If one's bank account returns only 3.5% pre-tax, but the level of prices is rising at 10%, one doesn't have to be a mathematical genius to figure out that in the long run one's standard of living will suffer. You will hardly be able to create any wealth, because whatever returns you earn does not even help you keep pace with the rising prices in the economy, let alone give you a surplus that can earn you further returns.
If you are already wealthy then FDs might be a good wealth preservation instrument, but please don't use them to create wealth for yourself.
Don't sit idle, invest actively
Putting your money into a savings account of an FD is almost akin to sitting idle. India is going through an inflection, which is likely to last for a few decades, where the equity capital markets will be the best avenue for long-term investment and a good way to build an alternate and legitimate source of wealth. If you believe in India's economic growth potential, then move at least some of your money from your bank account into a higher yielding instrument to give yourself a fair chance to create long-term wealth.
By www.iTrust.in - India's leading one-stop financial supermarket for real estate, home loans, investments, taxes and financial planning.
NSE plans to list Nifty in London
Hopes to draw on LSE's expertise in small and medium enterprise segment.
The options contract of India's top equity benchmark index – S&P CNX Nifty of the National Stock Exchange (NSE) – could soon be listed on one of Europe's largest stock exchange, the London Stock Exchange (LSE). The managements of the two bourses on Wednesday signed a deal to evaluate future business opportunities between them.
Outside India, Nifty futures contracts are traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) and the Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX).
The benchmark index of NSE's rival, the Bombay Stock Exchange's Sensex, is already slated to be listed on the Deutsche Bourse and will start trading from October. The Sensex comprises 30 companies. Sources in the exchange said it is in talks to list the Sensex on other European exchanges, too.
In NSE's case, according to the Letter of Intent, both the exchanges will explore the possibility of having an agreement whereby the FTSE Group may license the FTSE 100 Index to NSE, while the domestic bourse may license its benchmark Nifty-50 to LSE for trading. LSE owns 50 per cent in the FTSE Group, a leading provider of market data and index.
"Currently, only Nifty Options will be listed on LSE and, at a later stage, it could be more than that," said Ibukun Adebayo, LSE's head of primary market division in India and international business development officer.
NSE Joint Managing Director Chitra Ramakrishnan said the exchange was confident that the Letter of Intent with the LSE would open up new investment opportunities for Indian investors and expand the bouquet of investible instruments that the NSE platform provides. "We also hope to draw upon the expertise of LSE in the small and medium enterprise segment (SME) for the benefit of Indian SMEs and investors," she added.
The agreement was signed by LSE's Chief Executive Xavier Rolet and NSE's Ramakrishnan in the presence of UK's Chancellor of Exchequer George Osbornse, who is leading a high-profile British business delegation to Mumbai.
The Nifty covers about 23 sectors of the Indian economy and over 60 per cent of the total market capitalisation of the underlying bourse.
LSE has been making persistent attempts to revive its derivatives trade. At present, LSE's derivatives operations are centred around Italian exchange IDEM and its London-based Russian derivatives exchange EDX.
The options contract of India's top equity benchmark index – S&P CNX Nifty of the National Stock Exchange (NSE) – could soon be listed on one of Europe's largest stock exchange, the London Stock Exchange (LSE). The managements of the two bourses on Wednesday signed a deal to evaluate future business opportunities between them.
The benchmark index of NSE's rival, the Bombay Stock Exchange's Sensex, is already slated to be listed on the Deutsche Bourse and will start trading from October. The Sensex comprises 30 companies. Sources in the exchange said it is in talks to list the Sensex on other European exchanges, too.
In NSE's case, according to the Letter of Intent, both the exchanges will explore the possibility of having an agreement whereby the FTSE Group may license the FTSE 100 Index to NSE, while the domestic bourse may license its benchmark Nifty-50 to LSE for trading. LSE owns 50 per cent in the FTSE Group, a leading provider of market data and index.
"Currently, only Nifty Options will be listed on LSE and, at a later stage, it could be more than that," said Ibukun Adebayo, LSE's head of primary market division in India and international business development officer.
NSE Joint Managing Director Chitra Ramakrishnan said the exchange was confident that the Letter of Intent with the LSE would open up new investment opportunities for Indian investors and expand the bouquet of investible instruments that the NSE platform provides. "We also hope to draw upon the expertise of LSE in the small and medium enterprise segment (SME) for the benefit of Indian SMEs and investors," she added.
The agreement was signed by LSE's Chief Executive Xavier Rolet and NSE's Ramakrishnan in the presence of UK's Chancellor of Exchequer George Osbornse, who is leading a high-profile British business delegation to Mumbai.
The Nifty covers about 23 sectors of the Indian economy and over 60 per cent of the total market capitalisation of the underlying bourse.
LSE has been making persistent attempts to revive its derivatives trade. At present, LSE's derivatives operations are centred around Italian exchange IDEM and its London-based Russian derivatives exchange EDX.
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
SKS Microfinance: An IPO at a PE multiple of 50 reminds one of the era of tech boom
There are other issues like commitment of the top management, high remuneration paid to top executives, geographical concentration of business and mismatch in its assets and liabilities
The much talked about initial public offering (IPO) of India's largest microfinance lender, SKS Microfinance Ltd, hits the capital market today with a price band of Rs850 to Rs985 per share. The issue closes on 2 August 2010. The issue opened for subscription yesterday for anchor investors. SKS is issuing 1.67 crore equity shares of Rs10 each.
With earnings per share (EPS) of Rs32.98 as on 31 March 2010, SKS trades at price earnings ratio of 26 at the lower band and 30 at the upper band. The issue consists of a fresh issue of 74.45 lakh shares with 50.37 lakh shares reserved for retail investors. Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs) will be allotted one crore shares. The company is expecting to raise Rs1,427 crore-Rs1,654 crore through this IPO.
Financials and other information provided by SKS appear good on paper. However, there are some issues with the company, like high valuation of the IPO, question of commitment from the top management, high remuneration paid to top executives, geographical concentration of business and mismatch in its assets and liabilities.
At the upper price band of Rs985, the company is demanding a valuation of almost 50 times its FY10 earnings. For a non-banking financial company (NBFC), which has a limited period of operational history and no dividend record, the valuation looks very much stressed.
Although the company in its draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) claims that it has no competitive peers, SE Investments Ltd, a microfinance lender, is already listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). SE Investments' EPS stands at Rs1.21 in the first quarter of FY10. The company posted a net profit of Rs17 crore. Based on the EPS of the first quarter of FY10, its P/E works out to 11 (annualised), which is lower than the PE of SKS.
SKS reported a net profit of Rs174.8 crore on total revenues of Rs958.9 crore and an operating revenue of Rs873.50 crore for the year ended 31 March 2010. It had a negative cash flow of Rs541.20 crore for the year ended March 2010.
According to the DRHP, the key management of SKS Microfinance has decided to sell their stake in the run-up to the IPO under both stock option and stock purchase plans at a significant premium. Collectively, the transactions would imply a sale of 1.42 million shares or 8.4% of the IPO size. Although the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has approved the transactions and there is nothing illegal about en-cashing investments, this raises a larger question of commitment on the eve of an IPO.
Another related fact is that out of the total issue size of 1.68 crore shares, more than half or 55.7% shares are put on sale by Sequoia Capital.
According to KA Prasanna of firstchoiceipoanalysis.com, the IPO of SKS Microfinance will make the promoters, and other venture capitalists including some private equity funds that have stakes in these companies, millionaires. The hapless borrowers continue to live in abject poverty, he added. Earlier in February, SKS Microfinance's founder and chairman Dr Vikram Akula sold 9.45 lakh shares at Rs639 per share to Tree Line Asia Master Fund (Singapore) Pte for $12.9 million, Mr Prasanna added.
SKS Microfinance also offers high remuneration to its top management. Its chief executive and managing director, Suresh Gurumani, is entitled to a consolidated salary of Rs1.5 crore per annum, besides a performance bonus of Rs15 lakh per year, with annual increments up to maximum of 100% with the board having the liberty to approve any further increase over and above the 100%. Another shocking part is that Mr Gurumani was paid a one-time bonus of Rs1 crore in April 2009, barely five months after joining the company.
SKS Microfinance maintains a medium- to long-term borrowing profile, against which its lending maturity is within one year. This creates a significant asset-liability mismatch and exposes the company to interest rate risk.
SKS has expanded its membership to 6.8 lakh across 19 States during FY10 from 2.02 lakh in five States from FY06. Currently the company has 2,029 branches with total outstanding loans worth Rs2,936.70 crore as on 31 March 2010. During the same period, its debt to equity ratio stood at 2.84:1 with net non-performing assets (NPAs) of Rs4.8 crore or 0.16% of outstanding loans.
SKS provides small loans exclusively to poor women located in rural areas across India. The loans extended are purely for business and other income-generating activities and not for personal consumption. The company will use the IPO money to meet future capital requirements.
With increased area of operation and scaled-up activities, microfinance is increasingly gaining credibility in the mainstream finance industry with many traditional large finance organisations contemplating a foray into this business. From the geographical perspective, microfinance activity has traditionally been concentrated in southern India as 57% of the microfinance institutions (MFIs) and about 71% of the microfinance borrowers of the country are from this region.
Currently, the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) holds the right of regulatory oversight over MFIs except NBFCs. However, there exists a significant regulatory risk as the government may create a separate regulator for all MFIs. More importantly, the high interest rates charges by these MFIs may attract regulatory actions from the government or regulators, which may have a material impact on the ability of these institutions to sustain high returns. For the year to end-March, SKS charged an interest rate ranging from 26.7% to 31.4% to its customers.
Recent rules require NBFCs to maintain a capital adequacy ratio of at least 12% by 31 March 2010 and 15% by March next year. SKS' capital adequacy ratio was much higher at 28.3% as on 31 March 2010.
Kotak Mahindra Capital Co Ltd, Citigroup Global Markets India Pvt Ltd and Credit Suisse Securities (India) Pvt Ltd are the lead book running managers to the issue.
Rating agency CARE has assigned an 'IPO Grade 4' to the SKS IPO indicating 'Above Average' fundamentals.
Background
Swayam Krishi Sangam (SKS) Society, a non-profit, non-government organisation (NGO), converted itself into SKS Microfinance, a non-banking financial company-non deposit taking (NBFC-ND) in 2005. Later in 2009, SKS Microfinance became a public limited entity from a private limited company. In addition to loans the company offers insurance products and productivity loans or loans designed for purchase of goods that enhance the productivity of members. SKS Microfinance has a tie-up with Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co Ltd and as of March 2010, had sold 2.9 million insurance policies.
SKS uses a village-centred, group-lending model to provide unsecured loans to its members. SKS Microfinance organises prospective clients into groups so that they can address the issue of information asymmetry and lack of collateral by transferring what could be an individual liability to a group liability and holding the group morally responsible for repayment. If one member fails to make the loan payment on time, the company may not extend any to that particular group in the future. Thus, the group can make payments on behalf of the individual defaulter.
According to the 2009 'Microfinance India State of the Sector' report, the average loan outstanding per client increased 23.8%to Rs5,200 in 2009 from Rs4,200 in 2008.
The much talked about initial public offering (IPO) of India's largest microfinance lender, SKS Microfinance Ltd, hits the capital market today with a price band of Rs850 to Rs985 per share. The issue closes on 2 August 2010. The issue opened for subscription yesterday for anchor investors. SKS is issuing 1.67 crore equity shares of Rs10 each.
With earnings per share (EPS) of Rs32.98 as on 31 March 2010, SKS trades at price earnings ratio of 26 at the lower band and 30 at the upper band. The issue consists of a fresh issue of 74.45 lakh shares with 50.37 lakh shares reserved for retail investors. Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs) will be allotted one crore shares. The company is expecting to raise Rs1,427 crore-Rs1,654 crore through this IPO.
Financials and other information provided by SKS appear good on paper. However, there are some issues with the company, like high valuation of the IPO, question of commitment from the top management, high remuneration paid to top executives, geographical concentration of business and mismatch in its assets and liabilities.
At the upper price band of Rs985, the company is demanding a valuation of almost 50 times its FY10 earnings. For a non-banking financial company (NBFC), which has a limited period of operational history and no dividend record, the valuation looks very much stressed.
Although the company in its draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) claims that it has no competitive peers, SE Investments Ltd, a microfinance lender, is already listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). SE Investments' EPS stands at Rs1.21 in the first quarter of FY10. The company posted a net profit of Rs17 crore. Based on the EPS of the first quarter of FY10, its P/E works out to 11 (annualised), which is lower than the PE of SKS.
SKS reported a net profit of Rs174.8 crore on total revenues of Rs958.9 crore and an operating revenue of Rs873.50 crore for the year ended 31 March 2010. It had a negative cash flow of Rs541.20 crore for the year ended March 2010.
According to the DRHP, the key management of SKS Microfinance has decided to sell their stake in the run-up to the IPO under both stock option and stock purchase plans at a significant premium. Collectively, the transactions would imply a sale of 1.42 million shares or 8.4% of the IPO size. Although the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has approved the transactions and there is nothing illegal about en-cashing investments, this raises a larger question of commitment on the eve of an IPO.
Another related fact is that out of the total issue size of 1.68 crore shares, more than half or 55.7% shares are put on sale by Sequoia Capital.
According to KA Prasanna of firstchoiceipoanalysis.com, the IPO of SKS Microfinance will make the promoters, and other venture capitalists including some private equity funds that have stakes in these companies, millionaires. The hapless borrowers continue to live in abject poverty, he added. Earlier in February, SKS Microfinance's founder and chairman Dr Vikram Akula sold 9.45 lakh shares at Rs639 per share to Tree Line Asia Master Fund (Singapore) Pte for $12.9 million, Mr Prasanna added.
SKS Microfinance also offers high remuneration to its top management. Its chief executive and managing director, Suresh Gurumani, is entitled to a consolidated salary of Rs1.5 crore per annum, besides a performance bonus of Rs15 lakh per year, with annual increments up to maximum of 100% with the board having the liberty to approve any further increase over and above the 100%. Another shocking part is that Mr Gurumani was paid a one-time bonus of Rs1 crore in April 2009, barely five months after joining the company.
SKS Microfinance maintains a medium- to long-term borrowing profile, against which its lending maturity is within one year. This creates a significant asset-liability mismatch and exposes the company to interest rate risk.
SKS has expanded its membership to 6.8 lakh across 19 States during FY10 from 2.02 lakh in five States from FY06. Currently the company has 2,029 branches with total outstanding loans worth Rs2,936.70 crore as on 31 March 2010. During the same period, its debt to equity ratio stood at 2.84:1 with net non-performing assets (NPAs) of Rs4.8 crore or 0.16% of outstanding loans.
SKS provides small loans exclusively to poor women located in rural areas across India. The loans extended are purely for business and other income-generating activities and not for personal consumption. The company will use the IPO money to meet future capital requirements.
With increased area of operation and scaled-up activities, microfinance is increasingly gaining credibility in the mainstream finance industry with many traditional large finance organisations contemplating a foray into this business. From the geographical perspective, microfinance activity has traditionally been concentrated in southern India as 57% of the microfinance institutions (MFIs) and about 71% of the microfinance borrowers of the country are from this region.
Currently, the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) holds the right of regulatory oversight over MFIs except NBFCs. However, there exists a significant regulatory risk as the government may create a separate regulator for all MFIs. More importantly, the high interest rates charges by these MFIs may attract regulatory actions from the government or regulators, which may have a material impact on the ability of these institutions to sustain high returns. For the year to end-March, SKS charged an interest rate ranging from 26.7% to 31.4% to its customers.
Recent rules require NBFCs to maintain a capital adequacy ratio of at least 12% by 31 March 2010 and 15% by March next year. SKS' capital adequacy ratio was much higher at 28.3% as on 31 March 2010.
Kotak Mahindra Capital Co Ltd, Citigroup Global Markets India Pvt Ltd and Credit Suisse Securities (India) Pvt Ltd are the lead book running managers to the issue.
Rating agency CARE has assigned an 'IPO Grade 4' to the SKS IPO indicating 'Above Average' fundamentals.
Background
Swayam Krishi Sangam (SKS) Society, a non-profit, non-government organisation (NGO), converted itself into SKS Microfinance, a non-banking financial company-non deposit taking (NBFC-ND) in 2005. Later in 2009, SKS Microfinance became a public limited entity from a private limited company. In addition to loans the company offers insurance products and productivity loans or loans designed for purchase of goods that enhance the productivity of members. SKS Microfinance has a tie-up with Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co Ltd and as of March 2010, had sold 2.9 million insurance policies.
SKS uses a village-centred, group-lending model to provide unsecured loans to its members. SKS Microfinance organises prospective clients into groups so that they can address the issue of information asymmetry and lack of collateral by transferring what could be an individual liability to a group liability and holding the group morally responsible for repayment. If one member fails to make the loan payment on time, the company may not extend any to that particular group in the future. Thus, the group can make payments on behalf of the individual defaulter.
According to the 2009 'Microfinance India State of the Sector' report, the average loan outstanding per client increased 23.8%to Rs5,200 in 2009 from Rs4,200 in 2008.
Know-your-distributor norms from Amfi soon
The Association of Mutual Funds in India (Amfi) plans to introduce Know-your-distributor (KYD) procedure for mutual fund distributors with effect from August 1 for all the entities desiring to engage in marketing of mutual fund products and ARN holders. It has been also been decided to engage services of NSDL Database Management Services, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSDL.In its letter to the fund houses, Amfi stated : "In view of urgency in the matter, kindly convey meeting of KYC Committee and submit recommendations promptly, so that KYD is implemented with effect from August 1."
Reliance Broadcast bags Delhi Metro deal
Reliance Broadcast Network on Monday said it has bagged a five-year contract from Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) for construction related works. The company has won the deal for developing DMRC's high potential line-III, Reliance Broadcast Network said in a filing to the BSE (^BSESN : 17957.37 -120.24).
SAIL (SAIL.NS : 208.55 +1.3) plans to pump Rs 100 cr into UP unit
SAIL on Monday said it will invest Rs 100 crore to revive its Uttar Pradesh unit, formerly known as Malvika Steel, which the steelmaker acquired last year. "The total cost of the plant's phase-1 revival has been estimated to be Rs 100 crore," the company said in a statement. SAIL acquired the defunct Malvika Steel for Rs 209 crore last year and rechristened it as the Jagdishpur SAIL unit.
HUL shareholders okay buyback
The shareholders of Hindustan Unilever have approved buyback of equity shares of the company. This is the company's second buy back in less than three years. The FMCG major had announced a buy back in July 2007, eventually buying 30.2 million shares for Rs 626.27 crore at an average price of Rs 207.13. At the time, it had announced a cap of Rs 230 per share for the buyback.
SKS Micro IPO price band at Rs 850-985
The nation's largest microfinance company SKS Microfinance on Monday fixed the price band of its IPO at Rs 850 to Rs 985 per share. The Hyderabad-based microfinance firm expects to raise up to Rs 1,654 crore through the initial public offering, which opens on July 28.
CIL (CUMMINS.BO : 615.75 +27.45) likely to file IPO papers next week
Coal India is likely to file a draft prospectus next week for its initial public offering, billed to be India's biggest issue, through which the government expects to raise about Rs 15,000 crore. "The company's board is meeting on August 5 to finalise the draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) and in all probability, papers will be filed with market regulator Sebi within the first week of August," a person in-the-know of the development, said.
Grasim's plant to operate in full swing
Grasim Industries, an Aditya Birla Group company, on Monday said production at its Nagda staple fibre plant, which was closed due to water shortage, will be back in full swing with monsoon filling up its reservoir. "With the onset of monsoon and the arrival of water in the Nagda reservoir, the staple fibre plant and the Chemical plant at Nagda have restarted in gradual manner and production is expected to be restored to full capacity soon," Grasim said.
UltraTech gets nod for Samruddhi merger
UltraTech Cement on Monday said it received nod of the Bombay High Court and Gujarat High Court for the merger of Samruddhi Cement with itself. Last year, the boards of Ultratech Cement and Samruddhi Cement, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Grasim Industries, unanimously approved Samruddhi's merger with UltraTech.
Reliance Broadcast bags Delhi Metro deal
Reliance Broadcast Network on Monday said it has bagged a five-year contract from Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) for construction related works. The company has won the deal for developing DMRC's high potential line-III, Reliance Broadcast Network said in a filing to the BSE (^BSESN : 17957.37 -120.24).
SAIL (SAIL.NS : 208.55 +1.3) plans to pump Rs 100 cr into UP unit
SAIL on Monday said it will invest Rs 100 crore to revive its Uttar Pradesh unit, formerly known as Malvika Steel, which the steelmaker acquired last year. "The total cost of the plant's phase-1 revival has been estimated to be Rs 100 crore," the company said in a statement. SAIL acquired the defunct Malvika Steel for Rs 209 crore last year and rechristened it as the Jagdishpur SAIL unit.
HUL shareholders okay buyback
The shareholders of Hindustan Unilever have approved buyback of equity shares of the company. This is the company's second buy back in less than three years. The FMCG major had announced a buy back in July 2007, eventually buying 30.2 million shares for Rs 626.27 crore at an average price of Rs 207.13. At the time, it had announced a cap of Rs 230 per share for the buyback.
SKS Micro IPO price band at Rs 850-985
The nation's largest microfinance company SKS Microfinance on Monday fixed the price band of its IPO at Rs 850 to Rs 985 per share. The Hyderabad-based microfinance firm expects to raise up to Rs 1,654 crore through the initial public offering, which opens on July 28.
CIL (CUMMINS.BO : 615.75 +27.45) likely to file IPO papers next week
Coal India is likely to file a draft prospectus next week for its initial public offering, billed to be India's biggest issue, through which the government expects to raise about Rs 15,000 crore. "The company's board is meeting on August 5 to finalise the draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) and in all probability, papers will be filed with market regulator Sebi within the first week of August," a person in-the-know of the development, said.
Grasim's plant to operate in full swing
Grasim Industries, an Aditya Birla Group company, on Monday said production at its Nagda staple fibre plant, which was closed due to water shortage, will be back in full swing with monsoon filling up its reservoir. "With the onset of monsoon and the arrival of water in the Nagda reservoir, the staple fibre plant and the Chemical plant at Nagda have restarted in gradual manner and production is expected to be restored to full capacity soon," Grasim said.
UltraTech gets nod for Samruddhi merger
UltraTech Cement on Monday said it received nod of the Bombay High Court and Gujarat High Court for the merger of Samruddhi Cement with itself. Last year, the boards of Ultratech Cement and Samruddhi Cement, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Grasim Industries, unanimously approved Samruddhi's merger with UltraTech.
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Investing for a long period the sip way
It is always difficult for retail investors to decide when to invest in and pull out of the stock markets. It becomes all the more difficult to do a long-term financial planning if markets are volatile and investors are not confident to invest in equities directly.
During such a phase, a retail investor can look at systematic investment plan (SIP) of mutual funds. As the name suggests, it is a method of investing a fixed sum regularly in a mutual fund and is like saving in a recurring deposit. It makes more sense to invest in a SIP when markets dip as one is not buying units at peak but small amounts continuously which will average out over a period of time. So, over a longer period of time upwards of five years your chances of making profit are much higher when compared to an one-time investment.
One of the key advantages of SIP is rupee cost averaging. It means that when markets go down, the fixed SIP installments buy more units and vice-versa. Since SIP installments are made at different points of time and at different net asset values, the purchase price of units average out over the investment period. (See graphic)
The popularity of SIPs in India can be gauged from a recent report by Boston Consultancy Group and CAMS which says that from 7 lakh live SIPs in 2003, the number has risen up to 22.5 lakh till date. In fact, in the first quarter of 2010, SIP subscriptions accounted for 19% of total inflows into equity mutual funds, compared with just 2% in 2005.
The report also underlined that average tenure of equity money staying invested in one scheme is about 30 months and nearly 50% of the asset under management (AUM) has an investment tenure greater than two years. Nearly 70% of equity money has investment tenure exceeding 12 months.
One needs to be a disciplined investor to pay the SIP installment every month. However, if you miss paying any installment you can pay the amount the following month and continue with the benefits. Like most other investments, SIPs too come with a three-year lock-in-period.
One does not need to accumulate a lump sum to begin investing in SIP. However, if one invests Rs 10,000 per month in an equity fund and has a surplus of Rs 100,000 with a long view, the amount can just be pushed into the SIP account. Remember, SIP is just a payment mode and not a scheme. A SIP enables an investor to take advantage of the growth potential of mutual funds even if he/she does not have a large sum to invest. Most mutual funds require only Rs 500 per month to start a SIP. An investor can opt to pay the amount every month via electronic clearance service from his/her bank. The mutual fund will debit the amount from the account every month. An investor should monitor the scheme every 3-6 months and check what returns the fund has given.
Though SIP is a disciplined way to invest and any time is a good time to start, experts say an investor should avoid investing in too many funds. If one does so, there are chances of investing in similar type of funds and returns getting fragmented. To start with, it is always advisable to choose four to five funds and divide the investable surplus equally. For example, if one has Rs 5,000 to invest in SIPs every month, he/she should go for two funds which has given good returns over a period of five years. Similarly, if one has Rs 10,000, he/she should pick up four or five funds. By doing this, funds can be tracked closely, returns can be maximised and risks associated with every market-linked investment products can be spread out.
During such a phase, a retail investor can look at systematic investment plan (SIP) of mutual funds. As the name suggests, it is a method of investing a fixed sum regularly in a mutual fund and is like saving in a recurring deposit. It makes more sense to invest in a SIP when markets dip as one is not buying units at peak but small amounts continuously which will average out over a period of time. So, over a longer period of time upwards of five years your chances of making profit are much higher when compared to an one-time investment.
One of the key advantages of SIP is rupee cost averaging. It means that when markets go down, the fixed SIP installments buy more units and vice-versa. Since SIP installments are made at different points of time and at different net asset values, the purchase price of units average out over the investment period. (See graphic)
The popularity of SIPs in India can be gauged from a recent report by Boston Consultancy Group and CAMS which says that from 7 lakh live SIPs in 2003, the number has risen up to 22.5 lakh till date. In fact, in the first quarter of 2010, SIP subscriptions accounted for 19% of total inflows into equity mutual funds, compared with just 2% in 2005.
The report also underlined that average tenure of equity money staying invested in one scheme is about 30 months and nearly 50% of the asset under management (AUM) has an investment tenure greater than two years. Nearly 70% of equity money has investment tenure exceeding 12 months.
One needs to be a disciplined investor to pay the SIP installment every month. However, if you miss paying any installment you can pay the amount the following month and continue with the benefits. Like most other investments, SIPs too come with a three-year lock-in-period.
One does not need to accumulate a lump sum to begin investing in SIP. However, if one invests Rs 10,000 per month in an equity fund and has a surplus of Rs 100,000 with a long view, the amount can just be pushed into the SIP account. Remember, SIP is just a payment mode and not a scheme. A SIP enables an investor to take advantage of the growth potential of mutual funds even if he/she does not have a large sum to invest. Most mutual funds require only Rs 500 per month to start a SIP. An investor can opt to pay the amount every month via electronic clearance service from his/her bank. The mutual fund will debit the amount from the account every month. An investor should monitor the scheme every 3-6 months and check what returns the fund has given.
Though SIP is a disciplined way to invest and any time is a good time to start, experts say an investor should avoid investing in too many funds. If one does so, there are chances of investing in similar type of funds and returns getting fragmented. To start with, it is always advisable to choose four to five funds and divide the investable surplus equally. For example, if one has Rs 5,000 to invest in SIPs every month, he/she should go for two funds which has given good returns over a period of five years. Similarly, if one has Rs 10,000, he/she should pick up four or five funds. By doing this, funds can be tracked closely, returns can be maximised and risks associated with every market-linked investment products can be spread out.
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Fund Pointer: Churning Pot
When fund managers churn portfolios to capture momentum and ride the short-term cycles, performance invariably takes a hit
Old habits die hard for many fund managers. Instead of making wise long-term investment decisions, some of them behave like traders and churn portfolios—their churning ratios going as high as 200%. Though they profess not to, many try to time the market, trade in derivatives and change their equity exposure at will. Out of the total 216 equity diversified schemes currently available in the market, 48 schemes have a churning ratio of more than 100%!
Many fund advertisements have an illustration of how a stock held over years can fetch handsome returns. They emphasise the importance of a buy-and-hold strategy. Sadly, many fund houses don’t seem to practise what they preach. The truth is: many fund managers try to chase momentum. Sometimes, they buy and sell the same stocks erratically for no sound reason.
This behaviour goes completely against the grain of mutual fund investing—making investments and staying invested for the long term. A high portfolio turnover does not necessarily lead to higher returns. On the contrary, returns often get eroded as a result of constant churning. The portfolio turnover ratio indicates the frequency of trades carried out by the fund manager—or the number of times he buys and sells stocks. Take, for instance, ICICI Prudential Growth Plan, which has yielded only 7% returns since inception, with a portfolio turnover of 232%. The ICICI Prudential Service Industries Fund too has provided returns of just 9% on its way to recording a turnover ratio of 231%. DSP BlackRock Top 100 Equity Fund recorded a churning ratio of 316% till March 2010. Returns were 6%. Similarly, the IDFC Enterprise Equity Fund, with a high turnover ratio of 206%, has managed to yield returns of just 3% since inception until March 2010. Others with a significantly higher turnover ratio but measly returns include Sahara Growth Fund, IDFC Strategic Sector (50-50) Equity Fund and JM Hi Fi Fund. On an average, schemes with a portfolio turnover ratio higher than 100% have yielded returns of 8% since inception.
On the other hand, schemes with comparatively low churning ratio (less than 100%) have provided better results. They have yielded 9% returns, on an average, since inception. Maybe returns have nothing to do with the number of times you buy and sell your holdings. The Templeton India Growth Fund, with a churning ratio as low as 8%, has managed to deliver 16% returns since inception. HDFC Mid-Cap Opportunities Fund has yielded 18% returns since inception with a churning ratio of 20%. Similarly, funds like the Tata Dividend Yield Fund (16%) and Reliance Equity Opportunities Fund (20%) have put in a decent performance, despite recording low churning ratios of 19% and 46%, respectively.
But that doesn’t mean that churning should not be practised at all. Slight churning of the portfolio every six months is advisable for a variety of reasons—to re-balance the portfolio and to account for drastic changes in the outlook for particular companies or sectors. However, constant and extravagant churning, as highlighted above, puts the portfolio under severe strain and the scheme ends up losing out in the long run. Interestingly, this is what fund managers preach, by and large. If this is supposed to be true for your individual investments, why should it not apply to fund companies?
Old habits die hard for many fund managers. Instead of making wise long-term investment decisions, some of them behave like traders and churn portfolios—their churning ratios going as high as 200%. Though they profess not to, many try to time the market, trade in derivatives and change their equity exposure at will. Out of the total 216 equity diversified schemes currently available in the market, 48 schemes have a churning ratio of more than 100%!
Many fund advertisements have an illustration of how a stock held over years can fetch handsome returns. They emphasise the importance of a buy-and-hold strategy. Sadly, many fund houses don’t seem to practise what they preach. The truth is: many fund managers try to chase momentum. Sometimes, they buy and sell the same stocks erratically for no sound reason.
This behaviour goes completely against the grain of mutual fund investing—making investments and staying invested for the long term. A high portfolio turnover does not necessarily lead to higher returns. On the contrary, returns often get eroded as a result of constant churning. The portfolio turnover ratio indicates the frequency of trades carried out by the fund manager—or the number of times he buys and sells stocks. Take, for instance, ICICI Prudential Growth Plan, which has yielded only 7% returns since inception, with a portfolio turnover of 232%. The ICICI Prudential Service Industries Fund too has provided returns of just 9% on its way to recording a turnover ratio of 231%. DSP BlackRock Top 100 Equity Fund recorded a churning ratio of 316% till March 2010. Returns were 6%. Similarly, the IDFC Enterprise Equity Fund, with a high turnover ratio of 206%, has managed to yield returns of just 3% since inception until March 2010. Others with a significantly higher turnover ratio but measly returns include Sahara Growth Fund, IDFC Strategic Sector (50-50) Equity Fund and JM Hi Fi Fund. On an average, schemes with a portfolio turnover ratio higher than 100% have yielded returns of 8% since inception.
On the other hand, schemes with comparatively low churning ratio (less than 100%) have provided better results. They have yielded 9% returns, on an average, since inception. Maybe returns have nothing to do with the number of times you buy and sell your holdings. The Templeton India Growth Fund, with a churning ratio as low as 8%, has managed to deliver 16% returns since inception. HDFC Mid-Cap Opportunities Fund has yielded 18% returns since inception with a churning ratio of 20%. Similarly, funds like the Tata Dividend Yield Fund (16%) and Reliance Equity Opportunities Fund (20%) have put in a decent performance, despite recording low churning ratios of 19% and 46%, respectively.
But that doesn’t mean that churning should not be practised at all. Slight churning of the portfolio every six months is advisable for a variety of reasons—to re-balance the portfolio and to account for drastic changes in the outlook for particular companies or sectors. However, constant and extravagant churning, as highlighted above, puts the portfolio under severe strain and the scheme ends up losing out in the long run. Interestingly, this is what fund managers preach, by and large. If this is supposed to be true for your individual investments, why should it not apply to fund companies?
The downfall: Commissions, IFAs, cheques and folios
The number of cheques released by AMCs to mutual fund distributors is dwindling as well as the number of active IFAs.
The sweeping changes introduced by market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in the mutual fund industry are still showing their after-effects. According to sources, two years back, some 39,000-odd monthly cheques were issued by asset management companies (AMCs) to pay upfront commission to distributors. In 2010, this number has plunged to around 9,000-10,000. Upfront commission is released on a monthly basis while trail is paid quarterly. A distributor gets upfront commission when he acquires new business while trail is paid to service the existing client. Currently 0.25% is paid as upfront commission and 0.50%-0.75% is paid as trail depending on the fund house.
“The number of payments received through the electronic clearing service (ECS) as well as cheques has dropped. People either wanted to consolidate or leave the business. People who have decent assets under management (AUM) are undeterred. New people are not joining. The general perception is that this business is not as remunerative as it used to be for a new person to join. This is because of SEBI’s misplaced perception that there is no role of an intermediary,” said a top official from a leading fund house, preferring anonymity.
“The number of cheque issuances among AMCs have dropped,” says a Mumbai-based distributor on the condition of anonymity.
However, registrar and transfer agent (RTA) sources say that the drop in cheques is primarily due to the ECS system. ECS facility was extended to distributors because of the delay and misplacement of cheques.
The following message doing the rounds in the mutual fund industry is a shocking revelation of the number of active IFAs. “What is the similarity between tigers and IFAs? Only 1,411 left. Thanks to SEBI.”
According to an official from a mid-sized AMC in Mumbai, the number of active IFAs bringing in new business has gone down to 1,200 from 5,000 in Mumbai alone. Around 80% of the business comes from metros like Mumbai, New Delhi, Chennai and Bengaluru. In Pune, hardly 40-45 active mutual fund distributors are working. In industry parlance, an active IFA is defined as someone who is still giving door-to-door service and bringing in new clients.
“Last year’s HDFC and Reliance Mutual Fund list showed 1,400 IFAs in Pune but now it has come down. I was submitting 30-40 new applications earlier, now I submit hardly 5-7 applications,” said a Pune-based financial planner.
The drop in the number of monthly cheques indicates that new business is not coming in and distributors are relying on the trail commission and past Systematic Investment Plans (SIPs). The industry added just 2,355 folios while equity funds lost 1.47 lakh folios in the month of July.
Some distributors are now shifting their focus to allied financial services like general insurance and company fixed deposits, which offer decent commissions while others are completely changing their business model.
After the crackdown on upfront commissions, distributors are struggling to acquire new business. The commission does not even cover the cost of acquiring a client. Now, even the trail commission is not paid to a new distributor in the event of a broker change.
“I have been in this business since 19 years and have a decent AUM. Around 650 families are investing through me since 1994. I have incurred an operating loss of Rs1.75 lakh in the last one year because of ‘no load structure’. Investors are not ready to pay the advisory charges because a number of bank channels are offering free services. We are not able to cover the operating cost of our organisation. It is very difficult to survive. After a lot of convincing we get around Rs40,000 to Rs50,000 worth of investments,” said Yogesh Kulkarni, proprietor, Royal Investments.
Sources also indicate that some mutual fund distributors have completely stopped sending self-declaration forms to AMCs due to the paltry commissions involved. SEBI rules mandate that all intermediaries send a self-declaration form to fund houses annually, failing which the fund house can stop the commission paid to distributors. The self-declaration form contains an acknowledgement that a distributor has disclosed the commission received by him to the investor.
The sweeping changes introduced by market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in the mutual fund industry are still showing their after-effects. According to sources, two years back, some 39,000-odd monthly cheques were issued by asset management companies (AMCs) to pay upfront commission to distributors. In 2010, this number has plunged to around 9,000-10,000. Upfront commission is released on a monthly basis while trail is paid quarterly. A distributor gets upfront commission when he acquires new business while trail is paid to service the existing client. Currently 0.25% is paid as upfront commission and 0.50%-0.75% is paid as trail depending on the fund house.
“The number of payments received through the electronic clearing service (ECS) as well as cheques has dropped. People either wanted to consolidate or leave the business. People who have decent assets under management (AUM) are undeterred. New people are not joining. The general perception is that this business is not as remunerative as it used to be for a new person to join. This is because of SEBI’s misplaced perception that there is no role of an intermediary,” said a top official from a leading fund house, preferring anonymity.
“The number of cheque issuances among AMCs have dropped,” says a Mumbai-based distributor on the condition of anonymity.
However, registrar and transfer agent (RTA) sources say that the drop in cheques is primarily due to the ECS system. ECS facility was extended to distributors because of the delay and misplacement of cheques.
The following message doing the rounds in the mutual fund industry is a shocking revelation of the number of active IFAs. “What is the similarity between tigers and IFAs? Only 1,411 left. Thanks to SEBI.”
According to an official from a mid-sized AMC in Mumbai, the number of active IFAs bringing in new business has gone down to 1,200 from 5,000 in Mumbai alone. Around 80% of the business comes from metros like Mumbai, New Delhi, Chennai and Bengaluru. In Pune, hardly 40-45 active mutual fund distributors are working. In industry parlance, an active IFA is defined as someone who is still giving door-to-door service and bringing in new clients.
“Last year’s HDFC and Reliance Mutual Fund list showed 1,400 IFAs in Pune but now it has come down. I was submitting 30-40 new applications earlier, now I submit hardly 5-7 applications,” said a Pune-based financial planner.
The drop in the number of monthly cheques indicates that new business is not coming in and distributors are relying on the trail commission and past Systematic Investment Plans (SIPs). The industry added just 2,355 folios while equity funds lost 1.47 lakh folios in the month of July.
Some distributors are now shifting their focus to allied financial services like general insurance and company fixed deposits, which offer decent commissions while others are completely changing their business model.
After the crackdown on upfront commissions, distributors are struggling to acquire new business. The commission does not even cover the cost of acquiring a client. Now, even the trail commission is not paid to a new distributor in the event of a broker change.
“I have been in this business since 19 years and have a decent AUM. Around 650 families are investing through me since 1994. I have incurred an operating loss of Rs1.75 lakh in the last one year because of ‘no load structure’. Investors are not ready to pay the advisory charges because a number of bank channels are offering free services. We are not able to cover the operating cost of our organisation. It is very difficult to survive. After a lot of convincing we get around Rs40,000 to Rs50,000 worth of investments,” said Yogesh Kulkarni, proprietor, Royal Investments.
Sources also indicate that some mutual fund distributors have completely stopped sending self-declaration forms to AMCs due to the paltry commissions involved. SEBI rules mandate that all intermediaries send a self-declaration form to fund houses annually, failing which the fund house can stop the commission paid to distributors. The self-declaration form contains an acknowledgement that a distributor has disclosed the commission received by him to the investor.
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
L&T Insurance all set to kick off operations
Private sector non-life insurer L&T General Insurance has received R3 approval from the insurance regulator, Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority (Irda). The company will start its operation after it gets necessary approval for more than 20 products, for which it has applied for.
YM Deosthalee, wholetime director & chief financial officer, L&T, said that entry into the general insurance is a part of the overall vision to build a wholesome financial services business in India.
Talking to media in Mumbai on Monday, Joydeep Roy, chief executive of L&T Insurance, said the capital base of the company will be Rs 175 crore. "In the retail space, we are focusing on four areas microinsurance in rural parts of the country, health insurance in the urban areas, lifestyle products like providing cover to motor and home loans and finally, livelihood insurance, including providing insurance cover to commercial vehicles," said Roy.
In the corporate segment, SME and construction engineering will be the focus areas for the company. When asked about the synergy of the company with its parent company, Larsen & Toubro, Roy said that distribution of network as being enjoyed by L&T Finance with 300 of its branches and the ecosystem of L&T will help them a lot in growing their business. "We have already opened 10 branches initially. We will be going to tier-II & -III cities of the country later on. The company has already employed 100 people so far," said Roy. He maintained that the company will go for underwriting-based pricing for its products
YM Deosthalee, wholetime director & chief financial officer, L&T, said that entry into the general insurance is a part of the overall vision to build a wholesome financial services business in India.
Talking to media in Mumbai on Monday, Joydeep Roy, chief executive of L&T Insurance, said the capital base of the company will be Rs 175 crore. "In the retail space, we are focusing on four areas microinsurance in rural parts of the country, health insurance in the urban areas, lifestyle products like providing cover to motor and home loans and finally, livelihood insurance, including providing insurance cover to commercial vehicles," said Roy.
In the corporate segment, SME and construction engineering will be the focus areas for the company. When asked about the synergy of the company with its parent company, Larsen & Toubro, Roy said that distribution of network as being enjoyed by L&T Finance with 300 of its branches and the ecosystem of L&T will help them a lot in growing their business. "We have already opened 10 branches initially. We will be going to tier-II & -III cities of the country later on. The company has already employed 100 people so far," said Roy. He maintained that the company will go for underwriting-based pricing for its products
Thursday, July 8, 2010
Exit load likely on early redemption in liquid plus plans from August 1
Indian fund houses plan to charge a fee, known as exit load, for early redemption of investments in the popular liquid plus schemes of mutual funds, starting August 1, which may prompt institutional investors such as banks and corporates to switch a part of their surplus money to other short-term debt schemes. Mutual funds may impose an exit load of 0.1-0.5% for early redemption in liquid plus schemes, which constitute about 35% of the mutual fund industry’s total assets under management (AUM) of Rs 6.76 lakh crore, according to officials in fund houses and mutual fund distributors. The bulk of the investments in such schemes are in money market and debt securities with a maturity of over 91 days. Fund houses intend to charge this fee to smoothen flows into such schemes and reduce volatility in returns as a new norm to value debt securities with maturities of over 91 days kicks in on August 1. Mutual funds fear that the new valuation rules could increase uncertainty in returns from this product, thereby reducing their popularity among investors. The period for which this fee or exit load would be charged would depend on the tenure of the scheme. “Liquid plus schemes can go negative on a day-to-day basis if average maturity profiles are longer and the mark-to-market (MTM) portion is higher,” said Sunil Jhaveri, chairman, MSJ Capital and Corporate Services, a New Delhi-based mutual fund advisor. Liquid plus schemes with an average maturity of 100-110 days could have exit loads between 7-15 days while the more aggressive liquid plus products with an average maturity of 120-140 days are likely to have exit loads between 15-30 days, according to Jhaveri and mutual fund industry officials. “By imposing exit loads depending on the average maturity, we are telling investors give us at least this time to give you reasonable returns,” said a senior official with a leading private mutual fund. “If there is volatility in the corpus, it will be difficult for us to manage the scheme,” he said, requesting anonymity. The imposition of exit load after August 1 could lead to some investors shifting money from liquid plus to liquid schemes. Liquid funds, which invest in debt instruments with maturity below 91 days, do not have exit loads. Fund officials said some mutual funds that had introduced this fee on early liquid plus redemptions a couple of years ago were forced to withdraw it because of protests from investors. This time, the fee may stay as industry officials and distributors do not expect investors to throng to liquid schemes because liquid plus schemes fetch better returns and are taxed lower. A DDT of 28.33% is charged on liquid funds while it is 22% for other debt schemes, including liquid plus schemes. Liquid plus schemes are likely to return 4-4.25% annualised in August because of their investments in securities of longer maturity. Returns from liquid schemes are expected to be 3.50-3.75% when the liquidity improves next month. “Investors have few alternatives... Many of them would be forced to stick to liquid plus,” said. Not all asset management firms are likely to impose these exit loads. “We are not likely to impose any exit load on our liquid plus scheme. Instead, we would advice investors to put money in our short-term fund (of maturity 6-15 months), which has a 15-day lock-in, that is of minimal risk,” said Nandkumar Surti, chief investment officer, JPMorgan Asset Management. |
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
A matter of fact dealmaker
Had Sunil Sanghai not been an investment banker, he could have been a senior strategist with one of the national political parties, or a career diplomat or the backroom boy of a corporate thinktank.
He shuns being photographed, rarely goes on record, and is the master of polite conversation: if he wants to, he can for hours talk to you without saying anything.
After a long, liquid lunch with a CEO or a senior bureacract, where Sunil will either stick to his spartan Marwari fare or skip food entirely because he’s on fast — and, he often is — our man will inevitably end up collecting more information than he shares.
He will meticulously make a mental note of all little details and trivia — tidbits of the corporate world, whispers in the corridors of power and winds of change in business environment.
Here’s a man who believes in cultivating people of all kinds and remembering whatever they say.
In the cut-throat world of investment banking, these qualities have come handy. Having spent four years in Goldman Sachs where he contributed significantly to the firm’s initial success in India — having executed complex transactions like the Satyam sale last year — Sunil will join HSBC in September as managing director, head of global banking.
In HSBC he would be responsible for the bank’s corporate banking and investment banking businesses in India.
In the world of deal making, Sunil was at the right place at the right time. He received his training from India’s No 1 dealmaker Nimesh Kampani at JM Morgan Stanley and had a brief stint with Morgan Stanley Singapore — experiences that shaped his understanding of financial products, and local and international markets.
In 2007 he became the managing director at Goldman, and in 2009 moved up to become i-banking co-head.
Over the years, as he made new friends, kept in touch with the old ones and picked up all the buzz that mattered, Sunil got himself associated with many firsts in the Indian capital market.
He was involved in ICICI’s first book building process in 1996, the institution’s first umbrella prospectus filing in 1997, several international listings by Indian companies, the first non-convertible debenture plus warrant issuance by HDFC, the largest follow on offering out of India by ICICI Bank in 2007, and the first IDR issue that was recently completed by the British bank StanChart.
“Somehow, he enjoys finding a creative solution to something that’s complex and difficult,” says a former colleague.
Surviving in an unforgiving world of dealmaking, Sunil is a disciplined, matter of fact man with a strange taste for religious writings, and all kinds of biographies.
“There’s always something to learn from such books,” he tells his friends. At 42, Sunil is a regular at the Mumbai marathon, and usually turns to his sitar and keyboard when he’s not scanning the Geeta or visiting temples in Varanasi.
That’s curious for an i-banker, a tribe that conjures images of flashy lifestyle and holidays in the Bahamas.
But make no mistake. Sunil may be far away from anything exotic, but he won’t waste a moment to step into that less familiar world if he feels a deal is brewing.
He shuns being photographed, rarely goes on record, and is the master of polite conversation: if he wants to, he can for hours talk to you without saying anything.
After a long, liquid lunch with a CEO or a senior bureacract, where Sunil will either stick to his spartan Marwari fare or skip food entirely because he’s on fast — and, he often is — our man will inevitably end up collecting more information than he shares.
He will meticulously make a mental note of all little details and trivia — tidbits of the corporate world, whispers in the corridors of power and winds of change in business environment.
Here’s a man who believes in cultivating people of all kinds and remembering whatever they say.
In the cut-throat world of investment banking, these qualities have come handy. Having spent four years in Goldman Sachs where he contributed significantly to the firm’s initial success in India — having executed complex transactions like the Satyam sale last year — Sunil will join HSBC in September as managing director, head of global banking.
In HSBC he would be responsible for the bank’s corporate banking and investment banking businesses in India.
In the world of deal making, Sunil was at the right place at the right time. He received his training from India’s No 1 dealmaker Nimesh Kampani at JM Morgan Stanley and had a brief stint with Morgan Stanley Singapore — experiences that shaped his understanding of financial products, and local and international markets.
In 2007 he became the managing director at Goldman, and in 2009 moved up to become i-banking co-head.
Over the years, as he made new friends, kept in touch with the old ones and picked up all the buzz that mattered, Sunil got himself associated with many firsts in the Indian capital market.
He was involved in ICICI’s first book building process in 1996, the institution’s first umbrella prospectus filing in 1997, several international listings by Indian companies, the first non-convertible debenture plus warrant issuance by HDFC, the largest follow on offering out of India by ICICI Bank in 2007, and the first IDR issue that was recently completed by the British bank StanChart.
“Somehow, he enjoys finding a creative solution to something that’s complex and difficult,” says a former colleague.
Surviving in an unforgiving world of dealmaking, Sunil is a disciplined, matter of fact man with a strange taste for religious writings, and all kinds of biographies.
“There’s always something to learn from such books,” he tells his friends. At 42, Sunil is a regular at the Mumbai marathon, and usually turns to his sitar and keyboard when he’s not scanning the Geeta or visiting temples in Varanasi.
That’s curious for an i-banker, a tribe that conjures images of flashy lifestyle and holidays in the Bahamas.
But make no mistake. Sunil may be far away from anything exotic, but he won’t waste a moment to step into that less familiar world if he feels a deal is brewing.
SBI MF appoints Dharmendra Grover as Fund Manager
The funds that will be being managed by him at SBI MF are Magnum MultiCap Fund, SBI Tax advantage Fund – Series I, Magnum Investment NRI – FAP and Magnum Balanced Fund. | |
| |
Thursday, July 1, 2010
Mutual fund investors to get single statement across all investments
SEBI has asked the four RTAs like CAMS, KARVY, Franklin Templeton and Deutsche Investor Services to club investor data together and provide a consolidated statement of account for all investments in mutual funds
Have you invested in five different schemes of different fund houses and are tired of receiving five different statements of accounts? Then you will be in for some relief. Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is mulling to cut down the paperwork and provide a common account statement for all mutual fund investors with the help of four registrar and transfer agents (RTAs). This move will reduce the paperwork and cost for AMCs. Deutsche Investor Services Pvt Ltd, Computer Age Management Services (CAMS), Franklin Templeton and Karvy Mutual Fund Services are the four RTAs who will work on compiling investor data.
“There is a plan to set up a separate platform so that the industry can deliver one statement across investments in various mutual funds. We have done some work on conceptualisation, scope of services, etc. Huge economies will flow in. It will reduce the efforts of investors and distributors,” said a source in the know of the development.
“There are two efforts that are being undertaken. One is that those who have a demat account (equity investors) can get their MF units in demat form for which the consolidated information is available with the National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL) and Central Depository Services (India) Ltd (CDSL). There is another effort going on where RTA data is being clubbed to provide a consolidated statement. There are resources available for aggregating data. There will be no sharing of investor information between NSDL and RTAs. The data aggregation will be based on PAN and things like that,” said another source close to the development.
For instance, if an investor is holding MF units in demat form with NSDL or CDSL and also some units through RTAs, he will get two separate consolidated statements. That is, one from NSDL and the second consolidated statement from the four RTAs. If he is also holding stocks, then the same demat statement will reflect his stock and fund investments together. If an investor’s information is with RTAs then he will get a single account statement across the RTAs.
CAMS and KARVY currently provide an online service on their website for investors to track their transaction status, account information and to see a consolidated view of account by providing an email ID. Investors are required to create a user account on the CAMS or KARVY website. There are plans to club this data across RTAs and send a single consolidated statement to MF investors.
The RTAs are awaiting SEBI’s nod for implementing this new system. According to sources, it is expected to be implemented by the next three to six months. KN Vaidyanathan, executive director, SEBI, had recently shared this plan in a recent mutual fund CII summit. “The third area where the regulator is working on is for those who come directly through the asset management companies (AMCs) or one of the investor services centre providers like KARVY or CAMS. We want to make sure that if the investor so chooses he should get a single view. We will put in place a mechanism where the investor will get a single view.”
“The proposal has been made. The regulator is very positive about it,” said a source close to the development. “This is good for the investors and industry at large. It’s late but it’s good that SEBI is thinking about implementing this. It will benefit all stakeholders,” said an official from a fund house.
Base rate of all banks
Ahead of the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) review of monetary policy on 27 July, most of the banks have announced their base rates.
RBI had directed all the banks to switch over to the base rate system from the existing Benchmark Prime Lending Rates (BPLR) system with effective from 1 July.
All new loans sanctioned after 1 July and those falling due for renewal from 1 July, (except exempt categories as per RBI Guidelines will now be priced with linkage to base rate.
| Banks | Base Rate (PA) |
| State Bank of India | 7.5% |
| Punjab National Bank | 8% |
| Bank of Baroda | 8% |
| Union Bank | 8% |
| Central Bank of India | 8% |
| Bank of Rajasthan | 8% |
| Indian Bank | 8% |
| Uco Bank | 8% |
| IDBI Bank | 8% |
| Indian Bank | 8% |
| Dhanlaxmi Bank | 7% |
| Federal Bank | 7.75% |
| State Bank of Mysore | 7.75% |
| Corporation Bank | 7.75% |
| Karur Vysya Bank | 8.5% |
| Canara Bank | 8% |
| Indian Overseas Bank | 8.25% |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)